Tejon Mountain Village will go to the Kern Board of Supervisors

by Brian Bierman

The Kern County Planning Commission made 2 votes against sending Tejon Mountain Village to the Board of Supervisors and 3 votes in favor.  This  was in agreement with the commission staff recommendation that described TMV as a responsible and well-planned project.

The opposition was given the majority of time to speak out against the project.  Opposing groups present included the Tri-County Watchdogs, The Center for Biological Diversity and others concerned with wildlife and environment.

Joseph Drew and Roberta Marshall of Tejon Ranch (TRC) together made a concise presentation within 20 minutes.  Marshall cited a survey of the Mountain Communities and said that 73% were for the development, 23% undecided and 4% against.

The opposition began testimony at 8:15 and continued for just over an hour; voicing concerns ranging from the California Condor to Native American artifacts to traffic and air quality impact.  A water objection was made by the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD). 

Attorney Adam Lazar of the CBD said TRC had reported "inflated supplies" of water from their valley floor water bank.  This was addressed by Lorelei Oviatt of the Planning Commission saying that they were well aware of TRC's water resources as well as supply for the entire county and said supply was adequate to meet requirements.  She said earlier in the evening that the project will not use ground water from the Tejon Pass so supply for the existing mountain communities will not be affected.  The California aqueduct will be the primary source with a water bank on the SJV floor in reserve for drought years.

Wildlife / environmental objections were reduced to a difference of opinion between experts.  Some against, others in favor.  The CBD argued against the proposed feeding stations for the California Condor.  Lorelei Oviatt responded by saying their complaint was against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and not TRC.

Commission Member Votes

  • Leticia Perez - Nay
  • Peter Belloumini -Nay
  • Chris Babcock -Yea
  • Jeff Florez - Yea
  • Ronald Sprague - Yea
The Kern Board of Supervisors will review the TMV project on October 5, 2009.


Related articles: Tejon Ranch: Land Conservation, Tejon Ranch: Wildlife


3 Responses
lwiens
9/11/2009
11:49 AM
JV game added. Will play Taft JV at 4:30
horseythyme1
9/16/2009
8:44 AM
We are already having water issues with restricted use, so how could it be possible that we can just come up with all this additional water? Are they going to restrict us even further and add additional penalties for over usage so they can build more homes? What about electricity, have you forgotten about the lovely rolling blackouts? What happens when the animals that have lived in this area FOREVER, come into the new neighborhoods that used to be THEIR HOMES, looking for food? People will freak out, call animal control and animals will be destroyed because humans have no idea how to co-exist with each other, let alone with wildlife! I read in the minutes from the last meeting that Kern has had an upswing in tourist dollars over the last year. Do you think tourists come to visit Kern for your resorts or to see huge cement slabs??? Uh, NO!!! They come because of the natural beauty! I, myself, LOVE Kern, and I go to the river ALL the time, there isn’t any place I love more. If this idiotic idea goes through, not only will you be destroying something as beautiful as the Tejon Ranch area, you will be destroying something that CANNOT EVER be replaced. What are you thinking? Oh, I forgot, you aren’t thinking…. Except for the money that you’ll be putting in your pockets. It seems suspicious that all the people in favor of this atrocity are the same ones that receive LOTS of money from the Tejon Ranch Company annually; it seems to me that they should be looked into. California is broke, building in an area with two of the largest earthquake faults in the area, and in addition to a high fire danger zone, how can insurance companies afford to cover homes, and just how many people will have the money it will take to pay for the insurance? What happens in the winter months when the highway is closed due to snow and terrible weather? Again, I ask, BUT maybe I need to ask louder, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING??????? On a last but not least note, you will probably see a lot less tourist dollars if this project goes through. It takes long enough to get to Kern from Los Angeles, this monstrosity will multiply the congestion horribly, I doubt anyone will want to deal with that, I know for the few days I can take off to get a way, I won’t want to drive 5 hours to get to Kernville, 3 hours is already long enough!
jackt
9/19/2009
1:05 PM
Where is the water going to come from? http://www.carlsbad-desal.com/ $25,000 worth of solar panels will produce enough power to water 100 water hog trees, like oak trees for instance. Any community adjacent to the california aqueduct will eventually down the line be able to take water out of the fake river and exchange it for solar power that it puts into the electrical grid. The nice thing about this type of water for power swap is on cloudy days when there is no sun there will not be a big need for water and vice versa. Down the line they will be able to take the power and turn it back into water near the coastal communities where the aqueduct water is destined to travel eventually.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Latest Poll
Who would you rather have as president now?

Visits to The Mountain Daily News 9/3/2010

174 in the past 24 hours
1300 in the past 7 days
5147 in the past 31 days

How does this counter work?

Advertise with The Mountain Daily News